top of page
Not All Emotions are Equal

Juan Korkie, Clinical Psychologist

Emotion is sometimes reified as the focus of couple therapy. It is important, but should be considered for its function in interaction. The problem is that it is often treated as a private inner state, as though its main significance lies in what someone feels inside themselves. In relational work, that is not enough. Emotion is not only experienced, it organises interaction. What matters is what happens when it enters the space between people and begins shaping what follows.

Emotion does something to the interaction. It pulls the other person in. It activates, directs, positions, and alters the conversation. In couple therapy especially, emotion cannot be understood only as internal experience, because the moment it is expressed it shapes what is perceived, what is experienced, and what happens next.

In working with couples I distinguish between three types of emotion based on this functional aspect.

Surface emotions are the most familiar. Anger, frustration, anxiety, overwhelm, tension, numbness. These emotions are real, but they are often broad and non-specific. Instead, they introduce intensity without direction into the interaction, which easily triggers activation in return. Structurally, these emotions increase reactivity rather than clarity. Because the signal is diffuse, the listener responds to the force of the emotion rather than its meaning.

Relational emotions function differently. Feeling dismissed, disrespected, criticised, ridiculed, rejected, invalidated, controlled. These emotions always carry an implied “by someone.” When a person says, “I feel dismissed,” what is structurally present is “by you.” That implication is not added by the listener. It is already present in the emotional form itself. These emotions point outward and locate responsibility in the other person, which is why they evoke defensiveness, justification, counter-attack, or withdrawal rather than hearing. They may be entirely valid, but validity does not change their relational impact.

Core emotions work differently again. Feeling not good enough, unwanted, invisible, ashamed, broken, lonely. These expose vulnerability and locate experience in the self. They do not point. They specify what is happening internally. Structurally, they slow interaction rather than escalate it. They make it easier for the listener to stay present, because they are not being met with diffuse intensity or with an implied accusation. What is being offered is vulnerability rather than pressure.

This is not a hierarchy of emotional value. It is an observation about relational impact.

In practice, surface emotions introduce intensity without direction and are reacted to without leading to curiosity or contact. Relational emotions point to the other person and implicate them, which shifts the interaction toward blame and defence. Core emotions locate the experience in the self without implicating the partner, which opens the possibility of vulnerability and contact. That distinction matters clinically, because different emotional expressions create different conversational conditions.

This is why the task is not simply to move underneath surface emotion, but to interrupt the form of the exchange and follow relational emotion back toward vulnerability. Not because core emotions are better or more “true,” but because they function differently in the interaction. They change what becomes possible between partners.

When the structure of the emotional exchange shifts, the structure of the interaction shifts with it. Partners are more able to hear each other. Activation reduces. Defensiveness softens. The conversation becomes less organised around protection and more able to hold contact. From there, different responses become possible.

That is the central point. Not all emotions are equal in their relational function and impact, and unless that is understood, couples can express emotion endlessly while the interaction continues to be activated and pushed beyond tolerance.

And this is why the role of the therapist is not to dismiss the emotional experience, but to support the expression of emotion in a way that changes what happens next.

bottom of page